Not surprised really. It's just one of many wakeup calls for her, and quite likely one she won't heed. Anyway, there's a difference between not having physical custody of a child following a split-up, a decision that can be changed when the parent shows that they can step up to the plate and be a decent parent, and having your parental rights terminated, which is a truly huge deal, one which severs your parental relationship with your child. You can regain custody in the family law system by showing that you've done some things about your sorry self (like drug and alcohol treatment and some decent counseling, for starters) but once you screw up so massively that you end up in the child welfare system, your chance of being able to parent your child is on a very fast downward slope. It is almost always better for children to be with a parent, than in the foster care system, even when the parent is not so great at their job, and I wish her well. I agree with Tyme that being a child celebrity is just so terribly damaging -- she's very good evidence of that. It's a wonder anybody at all survives that time.
As for her husband, I haven't heard anywhere that he's not doing a good job parenting those children. Sure, he's a really really bad musician, has very poor personal grooming, and looks terrible in a fedora. He's not the only guy to try that out (or to have children with more than one woman), but that doesn't mean he should have his children taken away from him.

» 6 Famous, Yet Improbable, Comebacks ... Last Reply: 1 year ago by Devin.
No, Gnorb, I'm last. (or at least last on this thread). I'm glad -- it is oh so very lonely having a grammar hissy fit without you around. xo